Minutes for March 28, 2003                                        APRIL NEWSLETTER

Reports:

Education
Emergency Alert System
FCC Update
Frequency Coordination Above 1 gHz
Frequency Coordination Below 1 gHz

 

Humor
Treasurer
Last Month's Newsletter

ENG Safety Memo

 

 


SBE Chapter 56 
Meeting Minutes


for March 28, 2003
at Tulsa Marriot Southern Hills

 

The Breakfast Meeting (sponsored by Chapter 56) was called to order by Chapter 56 Chairman Ray Klotz, Ray asked everyone present to introduce him or herself.

 

Reports:
Minutes:

Meeting Minutes: from the February meeting were brought up for approval as posted on the Chapter 56 Website.  The Minutes were moved, seconded and approved by voice vote of the members present.
 


Treasurers Report:
 

Not Available


Education Report:  

Ray Klotz reported the next test is at NAB 2003 April 8th the deadline to apply is March 1, 2003. The next local exam is June 6-16th the deadline for application is April 25, 2003.

Frequency Coordination, below 1 GHz:

Richard Hardy reported there was nothing new to report, no change from noted problem areas as reported last month.

 

Frequency Coordination, above 1 GHz: 

Not Available

Membership Report: 
Nothing new reported. 

Secretary’s Report
None. 

Web and Internet Report: 
Gerald Weaver and Ron Stearnes reported nothing new.

EAS Report: 

Roger Herring had nothing new to report.

 

Internship Committee:

Gerald Weaver and David Shaffer:  Reported that they are in the process of interviewing 5 to 6 candidates from Spartan. They will try to supply interns to any station wishing to have them.

Internet Report

No report.

Old Business:

Nothing Discussed.

New Business:

Nothing Discussed.

 

Ray Klotz thanked everyone for attending and gave special thanks for the exhibitors participation.

A motion to adjourn the meeting was seconded and approved by voice vote.


 

 


 

 

Humor
Below is our best attempt at humor. 
 
Try to remember, you get what you pay for here!

                           

 

                       

                                    John Kenne Major

 It is with great sadness that I inform the SBE membership of the passing of Dr. John K. Major, former owner of KCMA-FM, on March 18, 2003. He will always be remembered for “Keeping Classical Music Alive” in the Tulsa area from 1981 until 1995. He was called Dr. Major by many of his employees but he told me early in our professional working relationship he would prefer to be called John. 

In his early career life John was a Professor of Physics at universities in Ohio, New York and Illinois. In the seventies he surprised his family and friends by changing vocations to become a broadcaster, this move would combine two of his great loves, classical music and electronics. He worked for a time at classical music stations in Chicago and other places while searching for a place to build a classical music station. 

John found his broadcast ownership home in Owasso when he discovered he could build a new Class C FM transmitter near Talala, he did most of the application work for the station himself. In 1981 KCMA 106.1 went on the air as the first commercial classical music station in Oklahoma. Almost from the start John was working on an application to triple the antenna height at the transmitter and when it was granted he faced the reality that commercial classical music advertising revenue would not support the investment required to build the tower and transmitter. 

In 1986 KCMA 106.1 was sold and a few months later 92.1 was acquired and the KCMA call letters were assigned to that station. The 92.1 station was a Class A (3KW, 300 feet) but full time classical music was back on the air in Tulsa. John then started work on an application to upgrade 92.1 to a Class C2 and after four very hard years and many, many thousands of dollars spent changing the frequency of another station he had a construction permit for the current transmitter site. 

Although he could not always afford it John loved new technology. Moving the 92.1 transmitter presented major challenges for both of us since there were the studios of another radio station at the base of what was to be our new tower. In the past there had been a radio transmitter at the site and the RF into the studio equipment was a constant problem. I recommended we use an ERI Half-Wave Spaced Antenna that nearly doubled the cost of the antenna, after several weeks of debate he finally agreed. He did ask me at least ten times if that was my final decision, he wanted to make sure of my commitment that the antenna was required. After the transmitter went on the air in 1990 the RF problems in the studio equipment were minimal and were resolved quickly, only one interference complaint was received in the one year period following the start of operation. John was very happy with his new antenna and very proud that he had this new technology on his radio station. By the way the transmitter, transmission line and rack equipment were moved to the new site in one day, we started at dawn on a Sunday and the station was on the air about 10:00PM that night. After the transmitter site was constructed John was presented the Lifetime Achievement in Broadcast Engineering Award by SBE Chapter 56, Inc. for his many contributions to broadcasting.  

In 1995 the station was sold and John retired from his second career, full time commercial classical music in Tulsa has been silent since. He was one of the last local station owners in the Tulsa area. In his retirement years John kept very busy with volunteer work and participation in his church, John and I kept in touch by our common membership in Trinity Episcopal Church. I was honored to have worked with John as his engineer for twelve years and to have known him for the past twenty years, knowing him has been an asset to my career, I will miss him!

 

Richard Hardy  

 

 

Frequency Coordination Above 1 gHz
Larry Miller

     Nothing to report.

Frequency Coordination Below 1 gHz
Rich Hardy

Nothing to report

Education Committee
Ray Klotz

Applications for February exam dates are closed.

Applications must be received at National by March 1st for the exam period April 8, 2003.

The SBE Certification Committee has established the exam dates listed below for 2003.  Check for the time that is best for you.

If there is interest, we will have study sessions.  Let me know.  For more information about SBE Certification, contact me, SBE 56 Certification Chair Ray Klotz or contact Linda Godby, Certification Director at SBE National Office at (317) 846-9000.

CERTIFICATION EXAM DATES FOR 2003

2003 Exam Dates Location Application Deadline
June 6-16, 2003 Local Chapters April 25, 2003
Aug 15 - 25, 2003 Local Chapters June 13, 2003
Nov 7 - 17, 2003 Local Chapters September 26, 2003

                           

                        March 28th Program

           
7:30 a.m.-8:00 a.m.   Registration & Continental Breakfast
               8:00 a.m.-8:55 a.m.      Wireless Mics & In-Ear Monitoring in
                                                     a  Shrinking UHF Spectrum
                                                     Rick Belt-- Sennheiser
               9:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m.    One on One with an FCC Field Inspector
               10:15 a.m.-11:45 a.m.   Rules, New Rules, Using the FCC CDBS
                                                      & more.   David Layer--VP,
                                                      Science & Technology, NAB
                                                      David Oxenford--Attorney, Shaw Pittman
               12:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m.     SONY Buffet Luncheon with the Vendors
                 1:15 p.m.-3:00 p.m.     Evolving DTV Standards
                                                      David Layer--VP, Science & Technology,
                                                      NAB
                                                      Jay Gonzalez--Senior DTV Technologist,
                                                      MCSi
                 3:15 p.m.-4:30 p.m.     Building Networks & Storage for Radio &
                                                      TV John Rorke, Sr.--Account Executive,
                                                      Rorke Data
                                                      Chris Stone--Automated Storage Product
                                                      Manager, Rorke Data
                 4:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.     Engineers/Exhibitors Reception
 

 

                                

 

 

   

Emergency Alert System
Roger Herring

After a fine RMT was sent throughout the state, it quickly became clear that it was no AMBER test.  So, another AMBER test (CAE) has been rescheduled for Tuesday, April 22, 2003 at 10:45am.

Please insure your EAS encoder/decoder is upgraded with the new CAE code. 

The next scheduled RMT is for May 6, at 11:15a.m.  

Chapter 56                             
     
Treasurer's Report
          click here

 

 

 

click here

 

 

ENG Safety Memo

Information for Remote Transmission Professionals



excerpts from the Editor, Mark Bell.

Personal  Protective Equipment?

Should it be used by just anybody? Everybody?
 




Questions come up when news crews are de-
ployed to areas where pepper spray, tear gas, or
other irritants may be used for crowd control, such as
in the WTO riots in Seattle a while back, and other
crowd attractions such as current peace rallies.
There may also be trouble at a forest or industrial fire,
or just a typical house fire. Dangerous environments
raise questions of protection versus exposure.

One news director kicked herself for not being
more assertive after seeing a crew (via helicopter
camera) in danger while covering a forest fire on the
ground. The crew was advised of their apparent dan-
ger by cell phone, but stayed, only to be overcome by
smoke. A crew member was out of work for 6 months
from smoke inhalation as a result.

Some crews who respond to shootings or hostage
incidents feel as if they should be issued bulletproof
vests and helmets.

Perhaps there are some managers who feel as if
they want their crews to be close to such incidents
and may issue that type gear. And, as is the case of
the news director referred to above, there is also a
mind set among some that they don't want to place
their employees at that level of risk.

An article in the 12-00 Bureau of National Affairs
publication,  Occupational Safety and Health, quoted
a disability specialist regarding on-the-job injuries.

Jennifer Christian, President of Webility.com, a
company devoted to reducing lost work time, claims
the average cost of non-lost-work-time injury to em-
ployers is $400, "while injuries that result in lost time
cost employers between $12,000 and $19,000."

So, if you're a manager of crews equipped with
long lens capability, and you face risk of employee
injury and equipment loss (on top of the $12 to $19K)
by trying to get closer to events, what DO you de-
cide? Do you leave the decision up to the crews?



THERE'S MORE TO PROTECTIVE DEVICES, TOO

The use of many protective devices is not as sim-
ple as just putting one on. Gas masks, for instance,
aren't guaranteed to seal around every face under all
conditions. Got a beard? Forget it, and how do you
know the mask is up to date, been stored correctly,
or will filter out the intended chemicals?

How about bullet proof vests? OK, it covers your
ribcage and much of your gut. Does that mean
you're willing to have arms, legs, head, neck and
other parts of your body injured, maybe permanent-
ly? Does the company want you to assume that risk?

Sometimes protective gear may not do what the
user intends. Have you seen various laborers that lift
or move merchandise while wearing backbelts?
NIOSH, (National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health) completed what was described as "the
largest study of its kind ever conducted" on the sub-
ject. They concluded that there was no statistically
significant difference between the incident rate of
workers applying for workers' comp benefits who
used the belts every day, and those who did not, or
just occasionally used one.

Mast safety and detection devices may also be
considered a type of personal protection equipment,
and are being evaluated. They, too, have their limita-
tions and points of excellence.

The major question in the end is, what's protect-
ed, what's exposed, and what's the element of risk
worth in the end? If the firefighter you're standing
next to has $1500 of protective gear on and using a
breathing apparatus because of the smoke of the fire
you're covering, and you're there in jeans, cotton
socks, sneakers and a station jersey shooting b-roll
for what may be a 30 second v/o, or even a full
feature story, you may be exceeding the amount of
risk your employer wants you to assume.

Employees need to work together and evaluate
the amount of risk required to do their job, or any
particular task, with each challenge they face.

Be careful out there.

Contact information,
ENG Safety Memo:
Toll-free: 1-87-SAFE-6090
Phone: 781-383-6090
Fax: 781-394-0762
e-mail: safety@engsafety.com

www.engsafety.com




      

 

Web space generously provided by:

Any comments to the Webmaster